According to Rubio, the Court poses a threat to American sovereignty. He announced a broad diplomatic campaign to undermine the court's position worldwide. Washington aims to persuade other countries to end their political, financial, and diplomatic support for the ICC.
Unacceptable
The European Union responded almost immediately. Brussels declared its unwavering support for the Court and emphasized that it must be able to operate independently and impartially. The EU considers threats against judges, staff, and other involved parties unacceptable.
Moreover, the EU rejects the American claim that the Court endangers the sovereignty of states. According to Brussels, the Court targets individual suspects of the gravest international crimes, not countries. This principle remains firmly upheld by the European Commission.
Promotion
Legal Proceedings
The United Nations also stand behind the Court. The organization calls the ICC an important part of the international legal system and highlights the court's role in prosecuting the most serious international crimes. Together with the EU, the UN warns that political pressure must not undermine legal proceedings.
USA Sanctions
Rubio made clear that the United States is prepared to use a range of measures to achieve its goal. These include diplomatic pressure, sanctions, travel restrictions, and other actions against individuals and organizations supporting the Court. Countries closely cooperating with Washington may also face additional pressure.
The American administration is building on previous measures against the Court. According to the announcement, the new campaign represents a further intensification of pressure on the institution and on countries continuing their cooperation with the Court. Washington asserts that the Court must not prosecute American military personnel and officials.
Israel
Tensions have escalated further due to recent investigations and arrest warrants issued by the Court against Israeli leaders. Washington views these developments as a key reason to take a tougher stance against the Court, while Brussels maintains its commitment to the independence of international justice.
This places the United States and their European allies once again in direct opposition over the role and future of the International Criminal Court.