Meta and TikTok disagree with how the EU calculated the so-called oversight fees. This fee has been imposed on large digital platforms since 2023, as part of the Digital Services Act (DSA). Both companies argue that the method used to determine their contribution is unfair and lacks transparency.
The companies were presented with bills amounting to millions of euros. The amount is linked to the number of active users per platform. However, Meta and TikTok believe it is unjustified that the total amount of oversight fees was set in advance without taking their individual situations into account.
According to Meta and TikTok, the calculation is disproportionate to the actual efforts of the European Commission. They state that smaller platforms hardly have to pay, while they must bear a significant part of the costs. They consider this discriminatory.
The EU defends itself by stating that the oversight fees are based on the number of users in Europe, as mandated by the DSA. According to multiple sources, the amounts for 2023 were determined based on data about active users from August of that year. These figures had to be provided by the companies themselves.
European Commissioner Thierry Breton previously defended the European policy by stating that the EU handles digital regulation more transparently and fairly than the United States.
The lawsuit is being heard at the General Court of the European Union, the EU's second highest court. According to multiple sources, Meta and TikTok hope that the Court will reject or revise the calculation method. When a ruling will be issued is not yet known.