In the so-called 'return hubs,' immigrants are to be housed during the processing of their asylum requests, or where rejected asylum seekers from EU countries can be sent back. Italian Prime Minister Meloni started this a few months ago in Albania, but it was overturned by Italian judges.
Kristersson and Nehammer argued that only twenty percent of rejected migrants actually leave the EU. According to Kristersson, new strategies are needed to enforce existing rules and safeguard the integrity of migration policy. Nehammer added that without joint action, the credibility of the EU is at stake.
The plan foresees establishing reception centers in safe third countries such as Albania or Serbia, where migrants can stay until their situations are resolved. In exchange, these countries would receive financial or political support from the EU. The initiative aims not only to increase the efficiency of deportations but also to discourage illegal migration, according to Kristersson.
Political pressure to address migration is high. Right-wing parties in many EU countries are calling for stricter migration laws. During the European Council in October, the role of third countries in controlling migration flows was already discussed.
Criticism of the plans continues. Human rights organizations warn of ethical dilemmas and violations of international laws in such reception centers. Opponents point to the risks of “outsourcing European responsibilities” to countries outside the Union. Still, proponents claim this approach is necessary to keep the migration system workable.